She knew she would have to compete for it. It was a well recognized brand that could pick and choose who they would interview and ultimately hire for the role. However, she believed she had a competitive advantage that most applicants lacked.
They were:
- Connections--as I stated before, she was well respected. Even after she left she stayed connected with many of her former colleagues. One of those included the hiring manger for the role. This would allow her to get her resume in front of the right people.
- Culture--as someone who worked at Company X for many years, she understood the company culture in ways that an outside hire wouldn't. She knew the players and how things got done. She could easily assimilate back into the organization, saving Company X time and money in on-boarding.
She was excited! She believed that with her experience, connections, and intimate understanding of the company's culture she could make a good case for returning. She applied and also alerted the hiring manager of her interest. And then a few weeks later she got a response. It was an auto-reply email, where Company X thanked her for applying, but unfortunately her skills and abilities didn't match the requirements of the role.
Now here's the thing--she wasn't angry about not getting an interview (disappointed, yes, but not angry). What she was angry about is that they chose to treat her like another faceless candidate. In her mind all the years of work she put in didn't warrant a more personal response, one in keeping with the family-like atmosphere she remembered.
That's a shame. It's bad enough that many job seekers think that companies do a poor job of communicating with them. It's even more troubling when former employees, people who know and understand an organization, feel as if they don't matter. Not only has a company lost an applicant, they may have lost more. Former employees can now be an organization's customer. Having a sour experience may persuade them to take their business elsewhere. It may also prompt a backlash. Think about it--with sites like Glassdoor.com, or just through casual conversations with peers, former employees have plenty of ways to express their displeasure. Their inside knowledge also gives them a certain credibility that can't be easily dismissed. This can erode a brand's reputation in ways that others can't.
My friend has found work again. She's now looking to take what's she learned, personally and professionally, and apply it to her new role. And while she's gotten over her disappointment with Company X, she no longer keeps in touch with colleagues there. Nor does she buys their products.
My friend has found work again. She's now looking to take what's she learned, personally and professionally, and apply it to her new role. And while she's gotten over her disappointment with Company X, she no longer keeps in touch with colleagues there. Nor does she buys their products.
From a recruitment standpoint, what do you do to make former employees welcome?
I have no former employees, but I'd hope the answer to this question would be just treat 'em how you want to be treated yourself. Mind you - the person in your story did get a reply. When you and I chatted recently I think we agreed that setting and meeting expectations in these scenarios matters for sure.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Doug. The Golden Rule applies in this scenario. situations like this help remind me that there's more to be done to treat candidates with respect and empathy.
DeleteWhy if she did have formal contacts, did she not connect directly with one of the hiring managers, HR, or individuals w/in the company, or even go in, personally to get an interview?
ReplyDeleteWhat I got, was she "alerted the hiring manager", but, limiting the contact to only alerting the hiring manager of her interest, considerably would reduce your chances to not be treated like a generic applicant.
KM
Candidates also have to take initiative in their search. I always remember and do more for the candidates who follow up with me weekly.. the squeaky wheel...
Also, she may want to find out if the hiring manager had a "talk" with her former hiring manager.. - you know those "talks" to determine if she was as rehirable as she thought she was.. Cause we all know of the situations where individuals - through a chat or two, find out that a lot of "talks" were had about candidates, behind the doors..
Thanks for commenting Karen.
DeleteI don't have all the details but my impression of the conversation was that she reached out to a few people in the organization, both to express interest initially, and to follow-up on the status of her application. I don't know if it was direct (she actually spoke to someone) or indirect (she left messages).
There are lessons to be learned for both parties. I agree in theory that she could have done more to "sell" herself to her former employer. I also believe that the company's generic response is shameful, considering the context by which she applied and put them on notice.
No excuse is a good excuse here. This was just outright poor communication. Yes, she deserved more courtesy and consideration as a former employee and the letter should have been more detailed. But the other unsuccessful candidates should have been treated better too.
ReplyDeleteI come across generic, impersonal responses everywhere - not just in hiring situations. It seems especially rife in customer service.
It's just plain lazy and rude.
Thanks for commenting, Barbara. A lot can be done to improve customer service, whether it's recruitment related or not. I wish I had the answers myself!
DeleteIt is a tough situation for companies and candidates alike - Today I deleted over 400 emails - that is just a regular day in my book;
ReplyDeleteI also have to be OFCCP compliant.. so that means if I were to take time to reach out to one candidate regarding them saying a resume, then how I treat that particular candidate, I have to do the same for others.
Unfortunately I can't email every candidate a thanks for their resume - even an auto responder would send an email to all the spam I get as well, and then i will also have to delete the emails, and the correspondances, and then of course, emailing one, will mean emailing all, including those I have interest and those whom we have no interest... That is of course Unless I had a particular address just for jobs, which we don't
It is a tough situation to be in.. which is why candidates who do reach out to me directly, because they do, can expect to get responses as they moved themselves from applicants to candidates.. perse.. or at least moved themselves from the "regular" people.
Not sure if that makes any difference to any.. but..