Apr 26, 2012

Libraries, Old Men, and Social Intentions

I had a cross-channel interaction with Paul Hebert the other day. For those of you who may not know him, he's the Managing Director at I2I-Align (now Symbolist) a consultancy which works with companies looking to create or improve upon existing reward and incentive programs. He, like many people I know, has a pretty extensive online presence. He was lamenting the fact that people were choosing to populate their Google Plus status updates with their Twitter stream posts. In his mind part of the issue (#oldmanproblems, he called it) was his opinion that it wasn't in keeping with the spirit of social media, which leans toward interaction and engagement, not broadcasting.

I've heard similar sentiments myself. Just last week at an event targeting HR professionals wanting to better understand social media, I was speaking to a colleague who has an extensive online footprint. She spoke about how Facebook for her was highly personal, the one online space where she had a clearly established personal policy of not connecting with co-workers.

It wasn't because she had anything to hide, it was simply because it's become the only place where she can be ordinary. She's not there to extensively promote any of her online or offline professional endeavors. There she can choose, on her own terms, how and who she can interact with. And for her that meant being able to catch-up with friends and family, looking at how they grow and mature. The interesting twist to the story was how she had recently spent time convincing another HR colleague of hers not to delete their Facebook page. That person expressed feelings similar to Paul's, only the platform was different.

Fortunately, most of these social platforms allow you to filter what gets displayed for your consumption. For me, that means "muting" my connection's Farmville and Mafia Wars updates. For others, it may be performing similar functions on other sites.

As someone that lives in a city of over 8 million people, I can sympathize with Paul and my other colleagues. There are few quiet places in New York City, but they exist and can be found in all 5 boroughs. My favorite is the New York Public Library. It's an institution that does amazing work, both individually (through local branches serving their respective communities) and collectively (check out this 2011 article in The Atlantic describing some of their most forward thinking programs). And it's still a place where one can go to sit back, relax, and engage (or not) with other members over mutual topics of interest.

With regards to this discussion, the key differences between the social platforms I described and the New York Public Library is one of intent. We often forget that the primary intention of mediums such as Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, et al., is to make money. The primary intent of the NYC library system is to serve its members. Both serve broad populations but its intent drives how it creates, sustains and promotes its social presence. This is not to say that one organizational model is better than the other, it's just to remind people of this fact.

It's true, somewhat, that businesses large and small have invaded the social media space. That, coupled with the fact that more people in general are using these platforms, make it seem as if you're being bombarded. So it comes as no surprise that people are looking to personalize their space, to carve out a place where they can more clearly define who and how they want to interact with others.

Who doesn't want to inhabit a space where they can get away, and they're always glad you came?



So while we may lament the invasion of our (perceived) personal space, as individuals we have to realize that this is inline with what these platforms were created to do. Let's hope that someone puts forth an alternative to these other social media sites, one that can serve the intentions of old men and others of a similar mindset.

For organizational leaders, this sentiment, along with others such as social media fatigue, should be factored into your business efforts online. Just because you believe that your company should have a digital presence doesn't mean you should be present everywhere. Be cognizant of the culture of the audiences within each platform. 

More importantly, social media is an engagement platform. It's where interaction and conversation should be the primary method by which you court your target audience. If you choose to use it merely to push content (and to Paul's point, don't even bother to tailor it to suit the platform's context) your audience may choose to tune you out.

2 comments:

  1. I promptly retweeted his blog post after reading it, because I'm in agreement with him. I try not to be overly negative by ranting about things all the time, but there are a few things that have caused me to mute and unfollow people across the different social medium platforms.

    Regarding Twitter specifically, your last point is absolutely key. People have bombarded my TL with posts, re-posts, and more posts - the same ones repeatedly, some dating back to months ago. There was absolutely no engagement with others, only content pushing. I had to let them go. I created my current account with the mind to engage professionals and watch them interact with one another, but I've been partially fatigued to the point of reverting back to conversations with familiar people regarding personal topics. Back when I was strictly in that world, you saw conversations flowing 24/7, and people continuously engaging one another on different levels. Some HR people on my TL give me hope, because you see them showing their personalities and conversing with others beyond simply retweeting their retweets and saying thank you.

    I think this is an issue that generation old man and generation Y will generally agree upon. Although I'm cheating because I'm an old woman in disguise.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment Sheritz.

    I believe the combination of increased user adoption and automation will force many people into deciding if and how they will continue to utilize these tools. One of the things that I think will emerge from this is the adoption of better and more creative filtering systems. For example, I know many people that create a Twitter list with the express purpose of only adding those that wish to remain in active contact with. And Paul alluded to the fact that Google Plus circles perform a similar function.

    The other thing I see happening is the increased use of niche social platforms. While most people know of my LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter activities, I also belong to other less known social network sites. They serve a variety of purposes, and I intentionally keep quiet about my participation in them. Not everything I do needs to be heard; I'm not that important!

    ReplyDelete